Tag Archives: Pikes Peak Regional Real Estate Stats

The Stat Pack after the Downgrade

This post rated AA+.

From the subjective analysis that concludes the forthcoming August 2011 Stat Pack.

Advice for market participants:
SELLERS: You are right to believe that absolutely everything favors buyers right now including the price tag on your house. The question you must ask yourself is this: if you were a buyer in this market and this was the first-time you encountered your house, would you buy it? Would you buy your house during a time when the future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is questionable? When the US lost it’s AAA credit-rating? When job security was so tenuous? Yes, this is made up for by the fact that values are depressed, interest rates are incredibly low, and there are 20% fewer homes to choose from then just one-year ago. While all the data is positive as far as “the deal” is concerned, buyers are taxed with everyday concerns that make ANY compelling decision to buy your home  or someone else’s, extremely difficult. Whatever you can do to mitigate those concerns: do it.
BUYERS: This is the very definition of a kick-yourself market. Will you kick yourself for buying in this market? Or will you kick yourself for missing the boat and not buying? EITHER could be true. YOU are the only one that can answer that question, and it must be answered based on your personal situation. In the last 40 years, housing has not been this affordable. And at the same time, the perceived risk of making any major financial investment due to multiple circumstances beyond your control has never appeared greater. If you are in it for the long-haul, and that is defined as a period of time longer than five years of occupancy and ownership, then this is a brilliant market of markets to buy into. If you have any degree of uncertainty about five years of ownership, you best act quick on any decent rental, because there is only 1 – 3% occupancy out there in single-family rental properties.
Analysis:
A memory from my time studying history at Colorado College: freshmen regularly observed that “we learn from history” and “history repeats itself”. These comments would then be thrown out like fresh meat to a pack of starved lions, also known as the upperclassmen, who would pepper the room with their Aristotelian intellect, essentially rehearsing their law school application interview with startling logical brilliance. Of course we learn from history. Of course it repeats itself. But the implications of x and variables y and z will later cause the following courses of action, either action A or action B. It was simple. We were post-Cold War, Clinton-era wunderkids. We had it all figured out. Here was an orderly, systematized world that was easily understood and readily grasped.

Fast forward 15 years…
Standard and Poors just downgraded America’s credit rating to AA+. And the historical precedent for this is what exactly? Beyond that, the administration of this variable onto the system known as global finance will cause what future courses of action? A, B… Z?  Why did Standard and Poors downgrade Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac this past Monday, and not in 2009? Why is France with a substantially larger percentage of debt to GDP still rated AAA? Why can’t I defend away $2 trillion mathematical errors? Does it matter?
The bizarro land of real estate invokes the immortal words of gonzo journalist Hunter S. Thompson (which strangely becomes more relevant with each passing year) “when the going gets weird, the weird turn pro”. There is no editorial accident in constructing a SWOT analysis to lead-off this month’s Stat Pack that shows all strengths and all opportunities as the present condition of the real estate market. Without getting too subjective, it is pretty safe to say that everything out there in the real estate market is really good right now: prices are mostly stable, inventory levels are down substantially, foreclosures are down by over 30% from a year ago (which was down off of 2009), interest rates are microscopic at 4.25% as of this writing, prepaid PMI programs give buyers with high credit, real income and the knowledge to buy in good areas incredible opportunities right now and quite a few sellers want/need to make a deal. Everyone of those statements is objectively, measurably accurate.
The problem has to do with everything else that is beyond the consumer’s ability to control. When you buy real estate you participate in world finance, like it or not. All those subprime mortgages were tied to Mexican banana farms which were tied to Thai import/export companies which were tied to Korean manufacturing which were tied to Irish discount airlines. The series of dominoes from one man’s excessive spending in 2005 and subsequent foreclosure in 2007 ended up carrying global implications because bits and pieces of his mortgage and hundreds of other defaulting mortgages were scattered around the globe to investors in all corners. Everybody, everywhere owned just a little bit of everyone else’s little debts. No problem, until a bunch of those (ahem, AAA-rated) debts start to go bad. In the thunderclap that followed this meltdown, the economy of trust was broken. Banks slammed the doors of trust shut in late August 2007 and have barely cracked them back open. Now ten years removed from 9/11 and the beginnings of a war that has seen the sacrifices of a volunteer armed forces, we live in a society that suffers from disaster-fatigue, where meltdowns are increasingly common and increasingly expected. What’s the next order of magnitude to steal away the headlines? Just when you think you have seen it all, something new happens. And the backdrop for this is an ever-more-toxic political climate, where civil discord is a relic of the past.
Why this matters: Sellers more often than not bought in a feel-good era. Buyers today are buying in a feel-worse era. When sellers bought, their motivations were very different than today’s buyers. More likely, the reasons to not buy were not nearly as pronounced as they are today. This makes a seller’s job of marketing their property to a cynical, distrustful audience extremely difficult. This makes buyers more resistant to making decisions that are based on feeling good. People make real estate decisions electively for one of two reasons: pleasure or pain. It is easier now to market with language like: “pain-free”, “move-in ready”, “all-set”; rather than “luxurious”, “masterpiece”, “incredible views”. The first set of phrases use language that dominates the mind of the buyer: pain; inconvenience; problems; doubt; it then overcomes these fears and pains. A seller must speak the day-to-day language of the buyer in order to demonstrate value in today’s market.
This is all talk about the emotional climate of real estate and the difficulty of gauging cause and effect in today’s economy. The day after the S&P downgrade that basically discounted America’s ability to repay it’s debt, what happened? Wall Street went into shock, losing more than 5% and treasuries – the repayment of which was the very thing S&P was calling into question – saw a surge of money, propelling 30 year mortgage rates down. In the midst of all this chaos, the real estate side of the ledger improved yet again.
Year to date, Colorado Springs Real Estate is having a decent year that no one seems to know about. It is all relative and all compared to the last several years which have not been the rosiest of real estate sales years. This year, there will be about as many sales as 2008, more than 2010, slightly fewer than 2009. But what is most intriguing is that the number of listed properties, while still high based on the last ten years of inventory, is lower than at anytime since 2005. For six consecutive months, inventory has been at 6.1 months or less, a stable balance between supply and demand. Because there are fewer homes for sale and slightly higher demand than this time last year, the earlier drops in average sale price will probably balance out as the year finishes because buyers that are buying are less likely to see new listings come on the market and are more likely to try and make a deal with what is out there now, thus stretching slightly upward in price.
The best advice we can give: if you’re participating in a real estate decision for long-term reasons, ignore the toxicity of the present.

Mid-Year Review: July 2011 Market Stats

Click Here for Mid-Year Review Market Report

The Summer Viewing at Pikes Peak Urban Living is on the cat fight between two market metrics: Average Sales Price and Months of Inventory.

Months of Inventory is a handy-dandy metric to forecast, predict or… guess… what the market will do next. The barometer that has traditionally held sway is a 6 month supply of housing equals a neutral market. Get below six months and stay there and the market should see appreciation and increased seller-control. Go above six months, and that much to choose from sways control to buyers and prices drop. The majority of the last four years have been in excess of 6 months with a few brief months in 2009 under 6 months supply. July 1 showed a reading of 5.5 months. After three previous months from 5.9 to 6.1 months of inventory, that should be a predictor of prices going up.

Yet they haven’t done that.

Average price year to date is off 4% from a year ago. A lot of this was the post-tax-credit malaise that wrecked the market last spring. REALTORS went from running their engines at 110% in April to idling them in May, and never really getting them out of neutral the rest of the year. This year has been somewhat spastic, but overall, prices are steady to down then they’re showing appreciation.

Most everyone has an easier time understanding what has happened as opposed to grasping at what might happen, and correspondingly average price gets a lot of press. But as I spoke about last week, the relationship between units for sale and units sold is pointing to possible to likely improvements. The market has crested in inventory and is in the six to seven month cycle of fewer, not greater listings. There will be new listings each month, but not at the rate that they were before, and many good new listings will be recognized more readily as valuable by active buyers because buyers operating in the second half of summer and early fall generally have to make quick decisions. These are general conditions that don’t always hold, but with fewer than 4800 listings for sale, and two more months under 6 month’s supply likely… it will be interesting to see what happens to pricing over the next six months.

To see the active market numbers, Click Here for the Stat Pack.

Does Supply & Demand Rule Everything? If So, Which Way is the Market Heading?

I’m having more fun with math than any man should be allowed this morning.

Here is a quick snapshot in chart form of what the Pikes Peak MLS Market looks like in Single-Family Sales terms at Mid-Year.

Pikes Peak MLS Mid-Year Snapshot

Now, this is a graph of what the relationship between Supply and Demand looks like at Mid-Year, expressed as Months of Inventory (Total Active Listings Divided by Unit Sales per Previous Month).

2010 Tax Credit Expired on June 30, 2010.

 

 

October 2010 Colorado Springs Market Stats

“If live seems jolly rotten, there’s something you’ve forgotten, and that’s to laugh and smile and dance and sing…”

 

"Cheer up you ol' buggah!"

 

That’s right, cue the dying whistlers, and give Eric Idle’s “Always Look on the Bright Side of Life” a spin on the old turntable. September 2010 finished with:

  • Over 9 months of inventory supply
  • A mere 603 units closed
  • Over 5500 listings for sale

This post would be objectively bankrupt to not sit back and state: those numbers, suck.

So why “purse your lips and whistle”? No, the reason is not false optimism, nor is it that the real estate industry benefited from 603 morons that bought property last month. For starters, I’m certain Warren Buffett withhold such a judgment from those 603 buyers; and if he’s not, I sure as heck am not. Surely you remember

 

The Pin-Up of Economic Optimism: Warren Buffett

 

dead-sexy Warren, “Be greedy when others are fearful, be fearful when others are greedy.” When the Oracle of Omaha is making hay on railroads, it might help to think contrarian just like him. A good deal of the reason that so many people are selling at 2003 to 2004 prices these days is because they were greedy when they should have been fearful when they bought. They bought with the intention of selling higher. Money is not made on the sale. Money is made on the buy. You can never be in charge of the market dynamics when you sell. You can be in charge of market dynamics when you buy. With fear dominating the game right now, anyone with skin to put in the game should ask the question “are the masses, right?” I for one don’t think so. The masses bought with poor intentions.

Here is the positive data:

  • Average sales price for the year is up over 4%. This is not because homes are appreciating. That is not the case at all. It is because people are stretching their money on the low interest rates to get more home. Better homes are selling. Yeah, merit!
  • Interest rates are extremely low, with 4.375 a so-so rate. I have buyers locked on a 15-year right now at 3.65%!
  • Sellers have figured out that asking too much is just plain stupid. Never in the last six years have the: avg. sold price; new avg. listing price; all-listing avg. price; been so close together. If anything indicates a market moving towards balance, it is the relationship of these three values. So despite the big slowdown in demand and the corresponding increase in months of inventory, the prevailing forces of balance still have a strong foothold.
  • Pending sales data stabilized. In fact, weirdest single piece of data this year (so far!) is that September produced more pending sales than May or July.
  • September saw 300 sellers quit the market. This is good. There have been too many sellers trying to sell for too much yet again this year. They started to disappear in 2008 and were almost absent from the market in 2009 but came back this year under the false assumption that the market had improved enough to allow speculative pricing. In fact, the opposite has occurred. This trend will likely continue through the fall, setting up the strange likelihood that months of inventory will shrink between now and December.

The rest of the story is here:

 

October 2010 Stat Pack

 

Colorado Springs Real Estate Market Data March 2010

The Stat Pack is sizzling hot HERE.

Silver Bullets are good for killing werewolves. Not much else.

Save your silver bullets for John Landis movies...

Ask anyone in the real estate industry and they have a buyer who is sending them scared-stiff links that “prove” the real estate recovery is not happening like everyone says it is. Some gloomy desk-jockey-number-cruncher is usually quoted with a gloom and doom rubric “5 million more foreclosures” and “21% of American’s underwater” and “it’s now moving to prime mortgages.” The agent response to this phone call or email is usually just as incendiary… they sometimes reply with back issues of the Stat Pack as an attachment. Clashing gospels and dueling clanging gongs creates quite a racket.
The reality is that the economy is a giant gumbo of variables. Within 36 hours this week, all of the following were headlines: Colorado Jobs numbers much worse than expected; National Jobs numbers beat predictions; stock market near 18 month high; mortgage rates expected to rise as Treasuries stops buying servicing; mortgage rates at low for the calendar year; auto sales down 2%; retails sales unexpectedly up; nation’s consumer confidence goes down. Broncos have had a good week for free agents and the Rockies bench is looking pretty deep this year, too. All of these are true. None of these mean a thing on their own.
WHAT MATTERS NOW:
1.) Leverage: The most counter-intuitive aspect of the market, interest rates are staying below 5%. No analyst can say exactly why, everyone merely ventures a best guess. Most everyone is scratching their heads as to why they’re not going up. The Federal Government has been the wholesale market for treasury-backed securities, longhand for saying, they’ve bought the servicing rights on Fannie/Freddie mortgages for the better part of the last year. So if you’ve seen complaints about why the underwriting on mortgages got nutty, that’s a prominent clue as to why: the government put a trillion dollars of skin in the game on that one… Go figure they would prefer tighter appraisals. That treasury-backed securities practice has a budget that is probably out of gas around the first-of-April. After that… it’s back to the same private money that previously was buying servicing left-and-right up until mid-2008 when they saw the crisis about to break. The thinking on the street is that private money will be hesitant (to put it mildly) to buy servicing rights. Never mind that today’s mortgage has higher costs of origination, higher appraisal standards, higher consumer intelligence and 20 pages of additional disclosures attached to it making it one of the safest and best documented forms of paper wealth in America; these banks have been burned before and are expected to be either cautious or complete non-participants. The investment angle for banks is that they 1.) could make them a lot of money in the long-term based on the few players likely to play and 2.) make their shareholders jittery over the next 90 days and drive their stock value down in the short-term. Can you see the morass mortgages are? The bottomline: they’re low now! They may be going up, but they’ve rarely, in their American history, been lower (within 0.15% of the all-time bottom at this writing). Seasonal demand usually creeps them up in May and June anyhow, so a lock now is not a bad thing. Buying power right now (a.k.a. leverage) is almost unprecedented.
2.) Location: Where a home is greatly influences the value. Relocating buyers (#3 on this list) tend to prefer newer construction and so do the raised on Hi-Def & Wi-Fi generation of buyers. But values have held up well in the foothills. Year to date sales in some of the older areas have been abysmal. After a strong end to 2009, downtown has started off very weak. That might change as the more traditional downtown buyer begins to appear with the pedestrian-friendly, warmer months ahead. The months on market numbers vary wildly from neighborhood to neighborhood. Sellers, you can’t take chances if you have a year of inventory. No one’s going to pay near your price if that’s the case. Buyers… do you really want to buy where you’ll be surrounded by for-sale signs for another year?
3.) Relocation: the biggest drag on the Colorado Springs market has been the national market. Somewhere Else, USA used to be the friend of the Colorado Springs seller. The Pentagon-based Air Force Lt. Col. usually had made $100,000 in 3 years and sold their house with multiple offers. They could come west and buy pretty much whatever they wanted. With the onset of the market downturn nationwide in 2007, our market correction (which began in early 2006) deepened significantly. Reliant on the infusion of wealth from other markets, our over $350,000 market has suffered. Well strangely, of the 5 price-brackets to seen an increase in sales the last 90 days over the previous 90-day track (Nov. to Jan.), all of them were above $325,000. Some of that is local, but some of that is also the effect of other markets around the country having bottomed out as well, and their buyers are now able to buy here.
In closing, March 2010 dawns with more promise and hope then March, 2009. Hard not to. It remains a market of opportunity. Whenever there is opportunity, that means there is risk somewhere. Make your decisions wisely.

2009 End of Year Market Report

Updated Market Data

The 2009 Sales Year ended dramatically different than it began.

January was the depths of doom and gloom, lots of listings, lots of fear, skyrocketing job losses, Wall Street hemorrhaging.

Now, we’re back to worrying about Simon Cowel leaving Idol and “shocked” at the admission Mark McGwire used steroids. In other words, the economy is no longer a paramount concern.

But housing is. Last year, 62% of first-time buyers purchased a home because they had strong sentiments about home ownership. The good value rationale was sited as the number one reason among only one in ten respondents to the National Association of REALTOR’s Profile of Home Buyer’s and Sellers.

Locally, this bore itself out with a dramatic shift in the marketplace. The under $250,000 market improved throughout the year, while the $250,000 to $325,000 market made headway… and above $400,000, things actually got worse. Right now, 38% of all listings are over $300,000. Yet only 16% of all sales in 2009 were over $300,000.

Read more at Colorado Springs market leader in real estate information you can use, THE STAT PACK!

Where to Buy 2010, Part V: 59% increase in unit sales

All the data is Posted Here.

The hurry-up to the analysis is here…

Did the Gazette just describe the real estate market as “Soaring?” What happened to “plummet, freefall & plunge?
Remember November, 2008? There was not a cable-news network minute that went by without some new bank showing signs of weakness, some new stock plummeting, some new unimaginable sum in the billions of dollars being dedicated to a bailout of some enormous, household name entity that was ruled too big to fail. It was being called the biggest Wall Street Panic since the Great Depression and calling it the Great Recession seemed to be a euphemism for investors that were losing money to the tune of 30 to 60% in a single year. Terminology like plummet, freefall and plunge was routine. It was accurately applied to housing as average selling prices lost over 15% in 4 months and demand shriveled up.
December 2nd, 2009: Sales Increase 59%. Last November was the worst November in 15+ years in the Pikes Peak MLS. Numbers are numbers. A cynic looks at that increase and says, “that’s like the Broncos posting 10 points last week in a loss and winning with 16 the next. So what? The offense is still broken.”
In some regards, the system is still broken. There is less than 4 months supply of housing under $250,000 (that is NOT broken, that’s actually a hot-market). But there is over 10 months supply above $250,000 (that’s pretty slow, even for late Fall). If the numbers are used just to describe where things are today as compared to the recent past, the story is told halfway. It is better now than it was then; but how could it really be worse?
Where the numbers start to really illustrate and tell the whole story is when they are mapped and analyzed for trends. Months of Inventory has not been below 6 months on December 1st since the heyday of the boom market in 2005. That’s where it is now. Average price citywide is about $20,000 less than that time and interest rates are a full percent lower. And there are tax incentives to stimulate more demand, most importantly from first-time buyers who by definition, do not have a home to sell. The December Jobs Report showed a significant decrease in the rate of unemployment filings and durable goods orders are coming in ahead of forecast. Baby it’s cold outside… but the sun is shining. Consumers are cautious and value-oriented… but they are no longer terrified.
What Lies Ahead?
Be prepared for lots of forecasts and lots of media attention in the slow December News Cycle to be dedicated to the green shoots of a housing recovery. Some of this will be helpful, some of this will be accurate and a lot of it will paint with a brush broad enough to cover all 50 states in a minute and five seconds. The Real Estate Bust has definitely shown that real estate can move downward as a nation just as it can move upward as a nation. But the extremes of the market have been in coastal areas and places that posted unsustainable rates of growth. Middle America, places where population has continued to grow, places with lower than national rates of unemployment and neighborhoods that were less impacted by the explosive growth of new construction from 2003 to 2006 are the places where the recovery has already sprung. All of the above market conditions apply to Colorado Springs greater metro area.
“Value” will be the operative phrase to describe any recovery. The 2009 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers showed that the overwhelming reason First-Time Buyers chose to buy a home in 2009 was NOT the First-Time Buyer Tax Credit. Over 60% had the desire to own a home. The 2nd reason? Affordability (10%). Third? Change in Personal Situation (8%). Only 6% sited the tax credit. And yet look at those November sales when the tax-credit was initially supposed to end. It is a nice carrot that helps propel buyers past the tipping point of personal desire, decent selection, low interest rates and real estate at a four to seven year low in price. The tax credit is eventually unsustainable and it certainly does borrow buyers from the future and activate them in the present. But what better time to do that than when housing affordability is at one of it’s highest levels in record? Who else will consume the inventory of properties of willing (or unwilling) sellers who either need to move or hope to change their real estate investment? It greases the wheels of recovery so that the majority of participants can once again begin to buy and sell real estate.
Make no mistake, the old days will not return and the market has changed in nature and what consumers consider “valuable”. Over 90% of 2009 buyers started their search online; 37% found their home via the internet, and only 33% by their REALTOR. That sends an enormous message to sellers: BUYERS WON’T BE FOOLED. Buyers want thorough property descriptions of high-quality properties and will not waste time looking at over-priced and under-conditioned properties. Affordability has increased. Probability of sale will begin to increase. But that will happen only for properties (and sellers) deemed a better value than their peers.

Where to Buy 2010, Part IV: Yellow Lights

In my recent post, Where to Buy 2010, Part II: Green Lights, I documented two dozen areas that were showing positive enough signs of life to conclude that:

  • Price Depreciation was likely over
  • Supply and Demand was weighted slightly in favor of Demand increasing (or better)
  • The probability of sale was increasing
  • Values would like begin increasing by the end of first quarter, 2010 (if they were not already actively appreciating)

Now comes the harder part. Offending people who live in places where these important stabilizing factors are less evident. These are “the Yellow Lights” areas where:

  • Price Depreciation may still be occurring
  • Supply and Demand is not clearly favoring an increase in demand and an over-supply may exist
  • The probability of sale is at the market average (47%) or worse
  • Prices may not start appreciating in first quarter 2010. It might take until late 2010 for that to happen

Very quickly, anyone who can read through my cautious language will notice “may”, “maybe” and “might” all dominate the language of this post. The Yellow Lights are areas where there can still be some excellent buys. But a smart buyer who wants in on one of these areas needs to quantify their decision making. Is the home I’m interested in below the median value for the area? Are there any fatal flaws that would possibly hinder appreciation (near or backing to a busy road, non-conforming floorplan, etc.). Am I buying upgrades or dirt? (because the dirt is where the value is)

The ALMOST THERE…

These three areas all had one little glaring problem that kept them from Green Light Status.

OCC 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 186 216 199 149 109 122 164
Avg Price 169046 180837 171750 170945 152462 154462 166584
Expired/Failed 152 143 152 177 155 91 145
Total Units 338 359 351 326 264 213 309
Probability Sale 55% 60% 57% 46% 41% 57% 53%
Listed 58
Avg. List 220220
Tamarron 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 37 41 22 23 27 23 29
Avg Price 224281 240781 247860 263530 239940 228813 240868
Expired/Failed 17 9 19 22 19 20 18
Total Units 54 50 41 45 46 43 47
Probability Sale 69% 82% 54% 51% 59% 53% 62%
Listed 15
Avg. List 257420
Newport Heights 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 31 47 37 31 21 24 32
Avg Price 241980 265093 261895 296119 258056 246493 261606
Expired/Failed 31 14 22 21 17 10 19
Total Units 62 61 59 52 38 34 51
Probability Sale 50% 77% 63% 60% 55% 71% 62%
Listed 6
Avg. List 256933

In the Old Colorado City area, the probability of sale has increased and demand has picked up. But price has taken a beating every year since 2005. That’s odd that average price in this boutique and unique area started to drop two years ahead of other market. The consumer demand has been largely for less expensive properties. Qualifying the unique qualities of an over $200,000 home will be important for a 2010 buyer in Old Colorado City. Likewise, pricing has taken a hit in both Tamarron and Newport Heights. While the probability of sale has never dipped below 50%, it is interesting to note that surrounding areas have performed better.  When Tamarron (D20) is compared to Pinon Valley or Oak Valley Ranch (both D11), a larger, similarly priced property has had a lower chance of sale in the normally more appealing D20 area. Newport Heights average list price is actually below the 6 year average sold price. One difficulty here however is that the area is small and has many streets impacted by road noise (proximity to Dublin and Austin Bluffs). Homes on the inside and near open space will sell much more easily.

The, “These can’t possibly stay Yellow Light for Long” areas

Cheyenne Meadows 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 74 70 64 45 42 30 54
Avg Price 192149 204087 214987 211952 218016 209383 208429
Expired/Failed 31 22 28 30 48 35 32
Total Units 44 92 92 75 90 65 76
Probability Sale 64% 76% 70% 60% 47% 46% 64%
Listed 12
Avg. List 212041
Northgate 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 67 54 53 41 25 16 43
Avg Price 320870 382583 352463 333648 338654 344293 345419
Expired/Failed 23 30 28 39 33 23 29
Total Units 90 84 81 80 58 39 72
Probability Sale 74% 64% 65% 51% 43% 41% 59%
Listed 19
Avg. List 355089
Crystal Hills 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 15 18 25 12 20 18 18
Avg Price 280953 308650 345796 336833 315120 337027 320730
Expired/Failed 4 6 11 19 17 19 13
Total Units 19 24 36 31 37 37 31
Probability Sale 79% 75% 69% 39% 54% 49% 59%
Listed 14
Avg. List 346792

I was scratching my head looking at Cheyenne Meadows. That’s right up next to Ft. Carson and an always popular area with junior officers. With an average sales price similar to the city and high rental rates, this can’t possibly stay down long. But the probability of sale is lousy and price has reset to 2004 levels. Weird. Very similar circumstances north of New Life in Northgate (collectively Trailridge and Deer Creek). Prices are at the 6-year average and the probability of sale has been low for four years running. This despite a superb location and near many of the destination D20 schools. Then there is Crystal Hills. The only suburban-style neighborhood in Manitou, the problems here are a lower than expected probability of sale and higher than usual inventory. With the price reset to the six year average and an over-supply heading into winter, pressure is down on price (for the short-term). All three of these areas have something somewhat extraordinary to extremely special in their location. That will have to make a measurable impact on a return to better value sometime in 2010.

High-End Areas where the worst is probably over (but boy what a hit)

Mountain Shadows and Peregrine have both seen demand sour substantially in 2009. At one point in October of this year, Mountain Shadows had only 3 properties that had sold for over $400,000 the entire calendar year. For a long stretch of the summer, a half dozen Peregrine properties were in a race to the bottom in price, starting around $650,000 before settling between $575,000 and $615,000. And for the last several years, the Old North End has been characterized by very low demand over $500,000.

Mountain Shadows 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 77 87 74 48 57 44 65
Avg Price 323627 356627 374161 381103 378998 332717 357872
Expired/Failed 42 25 37 71 46 52 46
Total Units 119 112 111 119 103 96 110
Probability Sale 65% 78% 67% 40% 55% 46% 59%
Listed 26
Avg. List 440203
Peregrine 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 53 65 73 56 38 22 51
Avg Price 445883 520341 573800 528103 526349 471336 510969
Expired/Failed 34 25 32 41 37 44 36
Total Units 44 90 105 97 75 66 80
Probability Sale 64% 72% 70% 58% 51% 33% 64%
Listed 30
Avg. List 561746
Old North End 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 42 54 56 46 41 20 43
Avg Price 352358 376357 430213 406895 400573 384725 391854
Expired/Failed 40 28 34 27 30 25 31
Total Units 82 82 90 73 71 45 74
Probability Sale 51% 66% 62% 63% 58% 44% 58%
Listed 33
Avg. List 769969

In all three of these areas, the average list price remains above the six year average. But the year to date sales price has dropped below the six-year average. In all of these areas, a home under $500,000 is very much worth looking at. Homes asking over $650,000 though will have to offer the buyer something extraordinary. That is, until inventory levels shrink even more.

The Million-Dollar Drag

Pine Creek. Spires. Flying Horse. All of them have taken a beating with direct competition with new construction. All of them have a lot of inventory sitting on the market. All of them have a lower than expected probability of sale. Broadmoor Glen has the added nuance of present new construction that is starting at twice the average of the rest of the neighborhood.

Pine Creek 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 102 97 107 96 63 48 86
Avg Price 412235 456217 491999 491366 468159 429007 458164
Expired/Failed 56 59 61 93 81 82 72
Total Units 158 156 168 189 144 130 158
Probability Sale 65% 62% 64% 51% 44% 37% 54%
Listed 36
Avg. List 667759
Spires/B Bluffs 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 108 87 68 98 50 44 76
Avg Price 551509 575448 586949 579556 580599 520501 565760
Expired/Failed 58 47 65 85 85 69 68
Total Units 44 134 133 183 135 113 124
Probability Sale 64% 65% 51% 54% 37% 39% 61%
Listed 50
Avg. List 776643
Broadmoor Glen 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 32 24 18 19 17 11 20
Avg Price 340134 358016 392818 392647 452308 582500 419737
Expired/Failed 5 7 10 14 21 16 12
Total Units 37 31 28 33 38 27 32
Probability Sale 86% 77% 64% 58% 45% 41% 62%
Listed 8
Avg. List 602100
Flying Horse 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold - 16 57 48 36 32 38
Avg Price - 491533 490972 491940 448718 417985 468230
Expired/Failed - 2 13 44 61 38 32
Total Units - 18 70 92 97 70 69
Probability Sale - 89% 81% 52% 37% 46% 54%
Listed 34
Avg. List 912304

In all four areas, the “average” property for sale requires not just jumbo financing, but super jumbo financing or a cash buyer. There are not many of either. Since all three areas have homes from $400,000 to well over a million, even talking about them as “areas” requires a discussion of areas within areas. A home on the Golf Course in Pine Creek with a nice lot and great upgrades will probably sell at a respectable price. A home that isn’t on Paisely (where it seems everything is for sale near the top) and is in the low $600,000′s will likely sell in the Spires. In Broadmoor Glen homes can move very quickly… or take forever. The price span is largest here, with home starting around $300,000 (selling very well) and an over-supply of million dollar new construction in the Canyons (one to three units selling per year). Flying Horse is having a hard time selling anywhere north of $500,000, but under $450,000 is actually moving faster than 6 months. In all three areas, the bottom of the neighborhood in price seems to be activated; but the majority of the present listings are quite a bit more than “average”. These will take a year or more to see improvements.

The operative term here is “Yellow Light”. Many drivers see yellow light and hit the accelerator. That means change is about to happen, and if they act quickly, they can beat the change. That might be the case in some of these places. The safe money is found in the Green Lights. The Curve-Beating money is found when the light is yellow.

Where to Buy 2010, Part III: Green Light Data Edition

Wolf Ranch 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 28 111 84 80 57 52 69
Avg Price 305970 348121 394526 396895 367503 368180 363533
Expired/Failed 16 10 20 55 65 41 35
Total Units 44 121 104 135 122 93 103
Probability Sale 64% 92% 81% 59% 47% 56% 64%
Listed 30
Avg. List 371416
Skyway 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 40 43 34 25 8 26 29
Avg Price 249746 273427 333679 305375 333987 243388 289934
Expired/Failed 28 21 15 21 18 22 21
Total Units 44 64 49 46 26 48 46
Probability Sale 64% 67% 69% 54% 31% 54% 57%
Listed 11
Avg. List 331054
Pinecliff 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 23 24 13 27 15 13 19
Avg Price 345293 358016 367884 406895 384080 325053 364537
Expired/Failed 12 7 6 16 15 13 12
Total Units 35 31 19 43 30 26 31
Probability Sale 66% 77% 68% 63% 50% 50% 63%
Listed 7
Avg. List 389314
Cordera 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold - - 21 13 18 30 21
Avg Price - - 402201 427005 417182 388590 408745
Expired/Failed - - 0 6 15 16 9
Total Units - - 21 19 33 46 30
Probability Sale - - 100% 68% 55% 65% 69%
Listed - 19
Avg. List - 438845
Downtown 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 137 131 156 92 108 86 118
Avg Price 186939 198821 198488 210545 196956 187402 196525
Expired/Failed 109 76 80 85 78 41 78
Total Units 44 207 236 177 186 127 197
Probability Sale 64% 63% 66% 52% 58% 68% 60%
Listed 54
Avg. List 237723
Fairfax 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 143 150 140 120 99 67 120
Avg Price 215679 251518 252542 250635 237804 247789 242661
Expired/Failed 50 42 65 72 65 63 60
Total Units 193 192 205 192 164 130 179
Probability Sale 74% 78% 68% 63% 60% 52% 67%
Listed 29
Avg. List 247096
Gatehouse 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 111 128 91 79 61 58 88
Avg Price 249826 269487 281448 287350 276485 271733 272722
Expired/Failed 59 35 30 42 53 44 44
Total Units 170 163 121 121 114 102 132
Probability Sale 65% 79% 75% 65% 54% 57% 67%
Listed 11
Avg. List 274372
Vista Grande 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 101 116 113 94 78 59 94
Avg Price 168762 187375 186714 181848 168075 162927 175950
Expired/Failed 53 30 54 59 65 41 50
Total Units 44 146 167 153 143 100 144
Probability Sale 64% 79% 68% 61% 55% 59% 65%
Listed 16
Avg. List 237325
Summerfield 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 51 53 44 55 24 18 41
Avg Price 306615 331506 392408 365449 341415 317113 342418
Expired/Failed 13 13 15 28 19 19 18
Total Units 64 66 59 83 43 37 59
Probability Sale 80% 80% 75% 66% 56% 49% 70%
Listed 3
Avg. List 354996
Wedgewood 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 29 38 48 21 17 7 27
Avg Price 247500 277220 292065 264229 252552 281877 269241
Expired/Failed 19 10 11 8 10 7 11
Total Units 44 48 59 29 27 14 37
Probability Sale 64% 79% 81% 72% 63% 50% 72%
Listed 3
Avg. List 233250
Sable Chase, Misty Meadows, BRI 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 95 119 90 87 55 56 84
Avg Price 184598 200240 206681 210392 197909 192956 198796
Expired/Failed 41 32 38 43 35 30 37
Total Units 136 151 128 130 90 86 120
Probability Sale 70% 79% 70% 67% 61% 65% 70%
Listed 12
Avg. List 211250
Wagon Trails 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 194 197 133 109 97 82 135
Avg Price 235039 244862 252418 251508 239808 233896 242922
Expired/Failed 133 67 91 91 116 47 91
Total Units 327 264 224 200 213 129 226
Probability Sale 64% 75% 59% 55% 46% 64% 60%
Listed 30
Avg. List 296418
Pinon Valley 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 53 52 54 45 35 37 46
Avg Price 229440 229645 240097 237371 250062 227110 235621
Expired/Failed 25 15 14 23 14 8 17
Total Units 78 67 68 68 49 45 63
Probability Sale 68% 78% 79% 66% 71% 82% 74%
Listed 5
Avg. List 237840
Stetson HIlls 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 203 313 355 297 297 268 289
Avg Price 194051 209000 227478 240000 235572 222201 221384
Expired/Failed 124 125 172 272 232 174 183
Total Units 327 438 527 569 529 442 472
Probability Sale 62% 71% 67% 52% 56% 61% 61%
Listed 75
Avg. List 259399
Springs Ranch 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 234 299 244 155 118 123 196
Avg Price 222269 235000 246000 237478 218691 217583 229504
Expired/Failed 116 110 120 163 133 71 119
Total Units 350 409 364 318 251 194 314
Probability Sale 67% 73% 67% 49% 47% 63% 64%
Listed 54
Avg. List 245237
Norwood 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 141 118 104 81 62 54 93
Avg Price 195322 201336 213976 215038 208335 201727 205956
Expired/Failed 94 52 57 44 50 30 55
Total Units 44 170 161 125 112 84 148
Probability Sale 64% 69% 65% 65% 55% 64% 63%
Listed 13
Avg. List 220623
Rockrimmon 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 152 133 110 103 69 54 104
Avg Price 308490 320571 352425 366151 344536 311085 333876
Expired/Failed 101 46 54 84 77 60 70
Total Units 253 179 164 187 146 114 174
Probability Sale 60% 74% 67% 55% 47% 47% 60%
Listed 26
Avg. List 388530
Contrails 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 109 99 89 67 46 41 75
Avg Price 200913 216404 222565 230572 217874 215608 217323
Expired/Failed 48 16 23 46 25 21 30
Total Units 44 115 112 113 71 62 105
Probability Sale 64% 86% 79% 59% 65% 66% 72%
Listed 11
Avg. List 220427
Mesa Heights/PV 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 44 58 44 24 33 22 38
Avg Price 198826 214456 226259 252070 201974 224381 219661
Expired/Failed 15 25 23 14 18 11 18
Total Units 44 83 67 38 51 33 55
Probability Sale 64% 70% 66% 63% 65% 67% 68%
Listed 15
Avg. List 247040
Mesa Heights/PV 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Avg
Sold 44 58 44 24 33 22 38
Avg Price 198826 214456 226259 252070 201974 224381 219661
Expired/Failed 15 25 23 14 18 11 18
Total Units 44 83 67 38 51 33 55
Probability Sale 64% 70% 66% 63% 65% 67% 68%
Listed 15
Avg. List 247040

Where to Buy in 2010: Part II, Green Lights

Where to Buy in 2010 is a complicated affair. The buyer has so much chatter to sift through, so many conflicting opinions, and so much emotion to manage, that while it is a great opportunity, it is also fraught with peril and possible future disaster.

To be clear: it is a good time to buy. But it is a good time to buy IF a buyer is wiling to set aside priorities of shiny and new and instead, buy into a neighborhood.

Rather than rank neighborhoods or get too complicated with a convoluted metric that only makes sense to a statistical geek like myself, I have color-coded 44 neighborhoods in to easy-to-associate categories: Green Light. Yellow Light. Red Light. The data I used to come to these opinions involved analyzing and comparing these neighborhoods over each of the last six years, calculating the marketplace average for that time span for sake of comparison, and then plotting that against the present-day active market conditions. I looked at units sold, units that failed to sell, the average selling price, the probability of sale and what today’s total active units and average sale price looked like. A neighborhood that exceeded a 50% chance of sale over each of the last 6 years was unusual. A neighborhood that was selling above the 6 year average in 2009 was also notable. A neighborhood that had high unit sales, scarce active listings, a high probability of sale and a geographically desirable location proved to be an overall market leader.

A nearby neighborhood at a higher dollar figure with an increased probability of sale but a 20% drop from peak average value and a location that made it’s future demand questionable got the Yellow Light. An area associated with million dollar properties but an average sales price in the $700,000′s and less than a 20% chance of sale this year… that was a pretty easy Red Light.

Within any of these areas, there are homes and pieces of dirt that are exceptional and valuable in the long-term. This is a study of how actual neighborhoods are doing, not individual properties. It is very apparent that dirt matters. It is also apparent that there are notable market improvements throughout Colorado Springs. Of the 44 neighborhoods researched, green lights were awarded to exactly half (22).

Lastly, before showcasing the performance of these areas, this project is not complete. As usual, I bit off more than I could chew… or at least chew and digest. I need to add at least a dozen different neighborhoods in the coming weeks to include multiple parts of Monument, the East-Side, the Southeast Side and Fountain. Right now I am showcasing the information for the areas where I personally show or preview almost every month, and definitely make an appearance every quarter. There are other neighborhoods in town that have made spectacular improvements on the city’s east and south sides; and there are parts of Monument where demand has disappeared almost completely. This data will take longer to process, but will be treated with the same value association.

So without further ado: Where to Buy 2010

Green Light:

Sundown, Nor’wood, Oak Valley Ranch, Pinon Valley, Fairfax, Gatehouse, Sable Chase/Misty Meadows and Meadow Ridge/Contrails are the market leaders. These are areas in northeastern and northwestern Colorado Springs that have endured the market setbacks with consistent popularity and surprising value resilience. Every area has enjoyed a better than 60% probability of sale year to date and typically enjoys a better than 64% chance of sale over the last six years. The market average year to date is around 46% and has been less than 50% for each of the last three years. Prices suffered in each of these areas between November and March of last year due to bank-owned properties slamming the marketplace. Buyers gobbled these up quickly, frequently in bidding wars. Values plunged almost 10% in less than 2 quarters. The resiliency of these areas is all proven in the fact that they are all rebounding in price to nearly the same point as they were at the end of 3rd quarter 2008.

Among the newer areas, Stetson Hills/Ridgeview and Cordera are very solid value propositions. Stetson Hills has posted more units sold than any other neighborhood in each of the last six years. It is a huge area and I have some reservations about lumping it as a single area. But it tends to rise and fall as a singular entity. Presently, the average price stands above the six-year average. Over 300 units will probably close this year, behind only 2004 and 2005. Cordera is a real surprise. A record number of units have sold this year already and prices have been stable throughout the four-year history. It also boasts a 65% probability of sale. Apparently the master plan and collection of builders is finding fans in the buyer community.

Additional neighborhoods that get the Green Light include Mesa Heights/Pleasant Valley, Downtown (Patty Jewett & Divine Redeemer), Wagon Trails and Vista Grande. These areas have been less resilient to price fluctuations and have a lower probability of sale, but still have certain factors that show price appreciation in 2010 is likely. In Pleasant Valley, the average year to date sales price is still above the six-year average and the probability of sale has varied no more than 6% over the last half decade, varying from 64% to 70%. The only reason this is not an all-star is because there is a slight over-supply of housing with 15 units presently for sale, when only 22 have sold this year. Vista Grande is priced below 2004 values but has only 16 houses for sale. Such scarcity against the demand of 59 year to date sales says that sellers can probably stop worrying about depreciation. The average asking price is 40% higher than the year to date sales price, so if a buyer is looking under $180,000, they’re probably buying very well in Vista Grande. Wagon Trails has started to return from the big 2008 foreclosure crunch. Thirty units may sound like a lot for sale, but considering that this neighborhood sold more than 190 units in both 2004 and 2005, that is a very low supply for an always popular area. Prices have taken a hit downtown in terms of what has sold, but the asking prices show that there is still some resilience. With supply and demand heading back to a direction that favors sellers, downtown should experience an additional pick-up in activity in 2010.

Wolf Ranch and Pinecliff are two Green Light surprises. Wolf Ranch probably suffered more from the market meltdown than any other sizable neighborhood. In 2007, the average sales price dropped almost 10%, and then 2008 saw three national builders leave the market (John Laing went bankrupt) and foreclosures swept across the area. But prices have stabilized which is very unusual for a market in the mid-$300,000′s and the probability of sale has increased to over 50% which is also unusual for the pricepoint. Pinecliff has taken a beating this year in price, but that is primarily due to a value-enhancing quality: there is very scarce inventory. What has been on the market in 2009 has generally been below-average in terms of price. Only 13 units have sold this year (peak was 27 in 2007), but there are only 7 for sale (this is a 440 unit neighborhood). This is characteristic of a marketplace where sellers with equity have simply waited out the market not wanting to compromise their investments.  The higher end properties will probably start selling once more units come on the market and buyers begin looking at three to four homes in the area rather than one or two here, and ten somewhere else.

Briargate hosts two areas where buyers can probably scoop up a pretty good bargain: Wedgewood and Summerfield. Both of these areas have averaged a 70% probability of sale in the last six years but have stumbled in 2009. That means they have sellers who probably are ready to unload their houses in an area that is typically a magnet for relocation traffic (which is a big part of why they have stumbled in 2009: relocation is off tremendously from the 2006 peak).

Neighborhoods that just squeaked in on the Green Light are Old Farm, Skyway, Rockrimmon and Springs Ranch. In each of these areas, the prices that are selling are well-below the average sold price and the peak. But the probability of sale is visibly increasing. Since all three areas have pockets of higher end properties interspersed with properties at or even below the market average, they deserve attention from savvy buyers looking for long-term investments. A caveat is that in all three areas, the present listing supply is generally leftovers from the summer season. These may move up the list by 2nd quarter 2010. Springs Ranch has not performed nearly as well as it’s northern neighbor Stetson Hills over the last three years. The bigger concern is that there are still 54 units for sale. Properties take longer to sell here and while the probability of sale has increased, there is not the supply:demand ratio swing that shows definite price growth now. It looks likely in 2010, but has not yet materialized. The probability of sale has increased in 2009 from 47% to 64%. This was in part due to sellers getting more realistic with lower prices.

Finally, a handful of neighborhoods that rate as near-misses. These are interestingly all Higher End areas… and Old Colorado City. These are yellow light areas for a fairly uniform reason. Flying Horse, Pine Creek, Mountain Shadows and Broadmoor Bluffs/Spires are all known for higher value homes than their 2009 average sales price. The 2009 average sales price is well below the 6-year average in each of these areas. But almost without fail, where the inventory problem lies in these areas is in units that are well-above the six-year price average, and often well-above the market-peak for average price seen in 2006 and 2007. Strangely… Old Colorado City has the same problem. OCC is really a $200,000 area, but the average sales price stands at $154,000 for the year. When the median on-the-market asking price is 35% higher than the year to date average sales price… something still is not right. These are some of the Yellow Light Properties, where green shoots are beginning but improvements are yet to get rolling but should begin by 2nd quarter, 2010. More on these tomorrow.